Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W690
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
95 Imaging
38 Features
32 Overall
35
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W690 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Succeeded the Canon SX260 HS
- Updated by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W690 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX270 HS versus Sony W690, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and W690 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe SX270 HS was manufactured 13 months after the W690 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SX270 HS grades vs the W690 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W690 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Sony W690 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Sony W690
| SX270 HS | W690 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 | February 2012 | More modern by 13 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W690 over the Canon SX270 HS
| W690 | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Sony W690
| SX270 HS | W690 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W690 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX270 HS enjoys physical dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony W690 has specifications of 94mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX270 HS versus Sony W690 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the SX270 HS versus the W690.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX270 HS and W690 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W690 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing specifications. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX270 HS and W690.
Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Sony W690 to produce more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent SX270 HS should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W690 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX270 HS vs Sony W690 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lb) | 142 gr (0.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | 220 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $284 | $297 |