Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-G1
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Revealed November 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-G1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the EX-G1 (12MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX280 HS was unveiled 3 years later than the EX-G1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Canon SX280 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SX280 HS matches up versus the EX-G1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS & Casio Exilim EX-G1. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX280 HS Gallery & Casio EX-G1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Casio EX-G1
| SX280 HS | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 41 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Canon SX280 HS
| EX-G1 | SX280 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Casio EX-G1
| SX280 HS | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Canon SX280 HS enjoys exterior dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Casio EX-G1 has specifications of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") along with a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-G1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the SX280 HS compared to the EX-G1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX280 HS and EX-G1 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The visual here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX280 HS and EX-G1.
To sum up, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photos although you really should consider the age of the products into consideration. The more recent SX280 HS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-G1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Casio Exilim EX-G1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2009-11-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 2.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 pounds) | 154 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-800 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $325 | $61 |