Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-H10
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced March 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Canon SX280 HS and Casio EX-H10, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the EX-H10 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX280 HS was released 3 years later than the EX-H10 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SX280 HS scores vs the EX-H10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS & Casio Exilim EX-H10. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX280 HS Gallery & Casio EX-H10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Casio EX-H10
| SX280 HS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 46 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Canon SX280 HS
| EX-H10 | SX280 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Casio EX-H10
| SX280 HS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX280 HS enjoys physical measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-H10 has dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX280 HS and Casio EX-H10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the SX280 HS compared to the EX-H10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX280 HS and EX-H10 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX280 HS and EX-H10.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you really should factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer SX280 HS will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX280 HS vs Casio EX-H10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Casio Exilim EX-H10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-03-21 | 2009-06-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $325 | $300 |