Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dc76/4dc766248f034563e12a13497effee8c7beee50d" alt="Canon PowerShot SX280 HS front Canon PowerShot SX280 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1438/d14385703c610eaca90a6d6ea949c25068a4050f" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front"
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is FinePix S205EXR
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Canon SX280 HS versus FujiFilm S200EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is very well matched but the SX280 HS (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SX280 HS was unveiled 3 years later than the S200EXR and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX280 HS being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the SX280 HS matches up versus the S200EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS and FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX280 HS Gallery and FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the FujiFilm S200EXR
SX280 HS | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 45 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Canon SX280 HS
S200EXR | SX280 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and FujiFilm S200EXR
SX280 HS | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX280 HS provides outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the FujiFilm S200EXR has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX280 HS versus FujiFilm S200EXR in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the SX280 HS against the S200EXR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8094/a80943d598259830e9eff974635c2536a2714a34" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR size comparison Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX280 HS and S200EXR is 91 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f252/9f252d7c2ec865c6cf620407a8a1699354e438bb" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR top view buttons comparison Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX280 HS and S200EXR.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same MP but not the same sensor measurements. The SX280 HS offers the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging. The younger SX280 HS will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26d69/26d69a420919dd66e4c84dac21b64fd12565ba0f" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR sensor size comparison Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR sensor size comparison"
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/debe4/debe4568fda2e24c771212240771b5d981cdfce0" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
Also Known as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 6 | EXR |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 7.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lbs) | 865 gr (1.91 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6L | NP-140 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $325 | $500 |