Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm T200
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm T200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Previous Model is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix T205
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm T200 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Canon SX280 HS and FujiFilm T200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the T200 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX280 HS was announced 2 years later than the T200 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the SX280 HS matches up versus the T200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm T200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS & FujiFilm FinePix T200. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX280 HS Gallery & FujiFilm T200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the FujiFilm T200
| SX280 HS | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 27 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Canon SX280 HS
| T200 | SX280 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and FujiFilm T200
| SX280 HS | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm T200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX280 HS has outer measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the FujiFilm T200 has specifications of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX280 HS and FujiFilm T200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX280 HS versus the T200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX280 HS and T200 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm T200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX280 HS and T200.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the FujiFilm T200 to provide you with more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The younger SX280 HS provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm T200 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX280 HS vs FujiFilm T200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | FujiFilm FinePix T200 |
| Also called | - | FinePix T205 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.4-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 2.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233 gr (0.51 lbs) | 151 gr (0.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | 180 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6L | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $325 | $160 |