Canon SX280 HS vs Fujifilm F750EXR
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Canon SX280 HS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2012
Canon SX280 HS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Canon SX280 HS vs Fujifilm F750EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the SX280 HS (12MP) and Fujifilm F750EXR (16MP) and the SX280 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F750EXR (1/2") offer totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX280 HS was brought out 15 months later than the Fujifilm F750EXR making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SX280 HS matches up against the Fujifilm F750EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon SX280 HS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS and Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX280 HS Gallery and Fujifilm F750EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Fujifilm F750EXR
SX280 HS | Fujifilm F750EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2013 | January 2012 | More recent by 15 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F750EXR over the Canon SX280 HS
Fujifilm F750EXR | SX280 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Fujifilm F750EXR
SX280 HS | Fujifilm F750EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Canon SX280 HS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon SX280 HS provides outer measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Fujifilm F750EXR has sizing of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Canon SX280 HS vs Fujifilm F750EXR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the SX280 HS versus the Fujifilm F750EXR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX280 HS and Fujifilm F750EXR is 91 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX280 HS and Fujifilm F750EXR.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SX280 HS because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Fujifilm F750EXR will result in greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer SX280 HS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX280 HS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX280 HS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2012-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 6 | EXR |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 233g (0.51 lb) | 234g (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $325 | $445 |