Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z915
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
Photography Glossary Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z915 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Canon SX280 HS and Kodak Z915, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Kodak. The image resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is pretty close and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX280 HS was unveiled 4 years later than the Z915 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the SX280 HS scores versus the Z915 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The full galleries are available at Canon SX280 HS Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Kodak Z915
| SX280 HS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 | January 2009 | Fresher by 52 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Canon SX280 HS
| Z915 | SX280 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Kodak Z915
| SX280 HS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX280 HS has outside measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Kodak Z915 has proportions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX280 HS and Kodak Z915 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the SX280 HS against the Z915.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX280 HS and Z915 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The graphic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX280 HS and Z915.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Canon SX280 HS to result in extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern SX280 HS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $325 | $200 |