Clicky

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS front
 
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
Portability
65
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs

Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
  • Revealed March 2013
  • Succeeded the Canon SX270 HS
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview

Here is a thorough review of the Canon SX280 HS versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX280 HS (12MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SX280 HS was brought out 9 months before the Astro Zoom AZ651 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX280 HS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the SX280 HS scores vs the Astro Zoom AZ651 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

				

Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 SX280 HS Astro Zoom AZ651 

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Canon SX280 HS

 Astro Zoom AZ651 SX280 HS 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014March 2013Fresher by 9 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution920k461kSharper screen (+459k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 SX280 HS Astro Zoom AZ651 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX280 HS features physical measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).

See the Canon SX280 HS versus Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the SX280 HS against the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX280 HS and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 91 and 65 respectively.

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The photograph below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX280 HS and Astro Zoom AZ651.

As you have seen, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to resolve extra detail having its extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older SX280 HS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Portrait photography highlights
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography highlights
34
you can focus manually
comes with face detect focus
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
53
manual focus
good MP (21MP)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon SX280 HS as a Street photography camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Street photography camera
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (233g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
59
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than others in class (567 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon SX280 HS
Sports photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
36
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking focus
slow frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (210 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
51
incredible zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (21MP)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Travel photography details
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography details
61
lighter than competition in class (233 grams)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
bad battery power (210 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
60
good MP (21 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1560mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (567 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Landscape photography info
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography info
41
you can focus manually
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery power (210 shots)
does not have Timelapse recording
54
manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (21MP)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon SX280 HS
Vlogging with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
34
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (233 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone jack
60
relatively wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
lack of external mic support
heavier than others in class (567g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX280 HS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX280 HS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
 Canon PowerShot SX280 HSKodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
General Information
Make Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot SX280 HS Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-03-21 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 6 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 21 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 24-1560mm (65.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus distance 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 461k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s -
Highest shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps 9.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 233 gr (0.51 pounds) 567 gr (1.25 pounds)
Dimensions 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-6L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $325 $419