Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ
91 Imaging
35 Features
43 Overall
38
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Previous Model is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Canon SX280 HS versus Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX280 HS was manufactured 4 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SX280 HS grades against the SP-565UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX280 HS Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| SX280 HS | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 51 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Canon SX280 HS
| SP-565UZ | SX280 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Olympus SP-565UZ
| SX280 HS | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Canon SX280 HS enjoys outside dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX280 HS versus Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the SX280 HS versus the SP-565UZ.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX280 HS and SP-565UZ is 91 and 72 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specs. The pic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX280 HS and SP-565UZ.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Canon SX280 HS to give more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent SX280 HS provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 lb) | 413g (0.91 lb) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $325 | $400 |