Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus VR-320
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX270 HS
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Let's look closer at the Canon SX280 HS and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX280 HS was released 21 months after the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the SX280 HS scores versus the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS and Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX280 HS Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Olympus VR-320
| SX280 HS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 21 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon SX280 HS
| VR-320 | SX280 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Olympus VR-320
| SX280 HS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX280 HS comes with outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon SX280 HS and Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the SX280 HS compared to the VR-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX280 HS and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The pic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX280 HS and VR-320.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus VR-320 to offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer SX280 HS is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX280 HS Portrait photography details
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography details
manual focus
provides face detection focusing
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX280 HS
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (233 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Canon SX280 HS as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low battery pack (210 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Canon SX280 HS Travel photography info
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
lighter than average (233 grams)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
low battery pack (210 shots)
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition (158 grams)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX280 HS
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low battery pack (210 shots)
does not have Time Lapse mode
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX280 HS Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
reasonably wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (233 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic socket
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (158g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX280 HS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 6 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233 grams (0.51 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $325 | $179 |