Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dc76/4dc766248f034563e12a13497effee8c7beee50d" alt="Canon PowerShot SX280 HS front Canon PowerShot SX280 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Introduced March 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty close but the SX280 HS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX280 HS was introduced 19 months later than the GR Digital IV which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SX280 HS matches up vs the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX280 HS Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX280 HS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | More recent by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX280 HS
GR Digital IV | SX280 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX280 HS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX280 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SX280 HS vs the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47f93/47f930b73f8be7c83cc0e9ba23e8bd9314d2c1db" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX280 HS and GR Digital IV is 91 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e924/8e924034c596934c3cb1d7b83a349ea8cfcc033a" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SX280 HS and GR Digital IV.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SX280 HS having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Canon SX280 HS will provide you with more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger SX280 HS provides an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e275/5e275e6cf6c0da1ede1f1f6880ad221d7557e5ad" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cf01/3cf01ba1153ca3804f4658da223701c16076bbc9" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-03-21 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 233 grams (0.51 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | 390 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-6L | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $325 | $599 |