Clicky

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
  • 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
  • Introduced March 2013
  • Replaced the Canon SX270 HS
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty close but the SX280 HS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") offer different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The SX280 HS was introduced 19 months later than the GR Digital IV which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SX280 HS matches up vs the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SX280 HS GR Digital IV 
LaunchedMarch 2013September 2011More recent by 19 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX280 HS

 GR Digital IV SX280 HS 
Screen resolution1230k461kCrisper screen (+769k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 SX280 HS GR Digital IV 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX280 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SX280 HS vs the GR Digital IV.

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX280 HS and GR Digital IV is 91 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SX280 HS and GR Digital IV.

As you can tell, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The SX280 HS having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Canon SX280 HS will provide you with more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger SX280 HS provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography highlights
34
has manual focus
offers face detection focusing
no external flash support
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
41
you can focus manually
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Street photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography features
61
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (233g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Sports photography information
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography information
36
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (4.0 frames per second)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low battery power (210 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery life (390 shots)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon SX280 HS
Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
61
lighter than competition (233g)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
low battery power (210 CIPA)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
67
better than average battery life (390 shots)
built-in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography information
41
has manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
low battery power (210 shots)
does not have Time Lapse mode
53
you can focus manually
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (390 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX280 HS Vlogging info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging info
34
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (233g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
29
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX280 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Canon PowerShot SX280 HSRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Ricoh
Model Canon PowerShot SX280 HS Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2013-03-21 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 6 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-6.8 f/1.9
Macro focus range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 461 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 1 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 233 grams (0.51 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 shots 390 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-6L DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $325 $599