Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dc76/4dc766248f034563e12a13497effee8c7beee50d" alt="Canon PowerShot SX280 HS front Canon PowerShot SX280 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Introduced March 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Canon SX280 HS versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the SX280 HS (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX280 HS was announced 10 months before the WG-4 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the SX280 HS scores against the WG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX280 HS Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Ricoh WG-4
SX280 HS | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Canon SX280 HS
WG-4 | SX280 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | March 2013 | Fresher by 10 months |
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Ricoh WG-4
SX280 HS | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX280 HS enjoys external measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX280 HS versus Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the SX280 HS versus the WG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cafe/1cafe8a5e5a9a378f00fd74d61d7196b09c5f2e7" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX280 HS and WG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a26d7/a26d7537faa16dac23acba718f65271059df44ea" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The photograph below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX280 HS and WG-4.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 to produce extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older SX280 HS will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0682/e0682ad1c337f778f43e0fca50f4469e75406254" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac66d/ac66d970686851f3428c6070aac96c4d745bdade" alt="Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX280 HS vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Ricoh WG-4 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2013-03-21 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 233 grams (0.51 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 pictures | 240 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6L | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $325 | $330 |