Olympus 550WP vs Olympus SH-3
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 550WP
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 550WP vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus 550WP versus Olympus SH-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the 550WP (10MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 550WP was brought out 8 years prior to the SH-3 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the 550WP grades vs the SH-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 550WP vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 550WP and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 550WP Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Olympus SH-3
| 550WP | SH-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus 550WP
| SH-3 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 | January 2009 | Newer by 86 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 550WP and Olympus SH-3
| 550WP | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 550WP features external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 550WP versus Olympus SH-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the 550WP compared to the SH-3.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 550WP and SH-3 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 550WP and SH-3.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to show greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 550WP will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 550WP vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 550WP | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Also referred to as | mju 550WP | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2016-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.0 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $579 |