Canon SX280 HS vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Canon SX280 HS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Released March 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX270 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX280 HS vs Sony T900 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Canon SX280 HS and Sony T900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SX280 HS (12MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX280 HS was released 4 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX280 HS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the SX280 HS matches up against the T900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX280 HS vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX280 HS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX280 HS Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX280 HS over the Sony T900
| SX280 HS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 | February 2009 | More recent by 50 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Canon SX280 HS
| T900 | SX280 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 461k | Crisper display (+461k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX280 HS and Sony T900
| SX280 HS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Canon SX280 HS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon SX280 HS has got outside measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX280 HS and Sony T900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the SX280 HS vs the T900.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX280 HS and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX280 HS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX280 HS and T900.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution and you should expect comparable quality of photographs though you would want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The younger SX280 HS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX280 HS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX280 HS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX280 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-03-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 pounds) | 143g (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $325 | $300 |