Canon SX30 IS vs Casio EX-H15
64 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Canon SX30 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-840mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 601g - 123 x 92 x 108mm
- Announced September 2010
- Replaced the Canon SX20 IS
- Renewed by Canon SX40 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX30 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Canon SX30 IS versus Casio EX-H15, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the SX30 IS (14MP) and the EX-H15 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX30 IS was revealed 9 months later than the EX-H15 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX30 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SX30 IS grades vs the EX-H15 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX30 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX30 IS & Casio Exilim EX-H15. The full galleries are available at Canon SX30 IS Gallery & Casio EX-H15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX30 IS over the Casio EX-H15
| SX30 IS | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 9 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Canon SX30 IS
| EX-H15 | SX30 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX30 IS and Casio EX-H15
| SX30 IS | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Canon SX30 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX30 IS features physical dimensions of 123mm x 92mm x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") along with a weight of 601 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Casio EX-H15 has dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX30 IS versus Casio EX-H15 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the SX30 IS vs the EX-H15.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX30 IS and EX-H15 is 64 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX30 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The visual here may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX30 IS and EX-H15.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP and you can expect similar quality of files although you really should consider the age of the products into consideration. The more modern SX30 IS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Canon SX30 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX30 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX30 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX30 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H15 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-09-14 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-5.8 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 601 gr (1.32 lb) | 161 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 92 x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-7L | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $400 | $300 |