Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR
64 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
![Canon PowerShot SX40 HS front Canon PowerShot SX40 HS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-SX40-HS/Canon-SX40-HS-front.jpg)
![FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR/FujiFilm-S200EXR-front.jpg)
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-840mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 600g - 123 x 92 x 108mm
- Launched September 2011
- Superseded the Canon SX30 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as FinePix S205EXR
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Its time to look closer at the Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the SX40 HS (12MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is relatively well matched but the SX40 HS (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") have totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The SX40 HS was released 2 years after the S200EXR which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SX40 HS grades vs the S200EXR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX40 HS and FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX40 HS Gallery and FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX40 HS over the FujiFilm S200EXR
SX40 HS | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 27 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Canon SX40 HS
S200EXR | SX40 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX40 HS and FujiFilm S200EXR
SX40 HS | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX40 HS has exterior dimensions of 123mm x 92mm x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the FujiFilm S200EXR has specifications of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
See the Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the SX40 HS versus the S200EXR.
![Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR size comparison Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX40-HS-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX40 HS and S200EXR is 64 and 54 respectively.
![Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR top view buttons comparison Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX40-HS-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The pic here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX40 HS and S200EXR.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The SX40 HS features the tinier sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field tougher. The more modern SX40 HS will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
![Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR sensor size comparison Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX40-HS-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX40-HS-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-S200EXR-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX40 HS vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
Also called as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-09-15 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | EXR |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.7-5.8 | f/2.8-5.3 |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | PureColor II VA TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 7.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 865 grams (1.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 92 x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-10L | NP-140 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $330 | $500 |