Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981
64 Imaging
35 Features
50 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b74d/7b74d24b8f951306e0244be6cf7a52129965f162" alt="Canon PowerShot SX40 HS front Canon PowerShot SX40 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c378d/c378dd1d27b87b0a840c3383b7475dd39cae096c" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z981 front Kodak EasyShare Z981 front"
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-840mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 600g - 123 x 92 x 108mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Replaced the Canon SX30 IS
- Refreshed by Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Revealed July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Canon SX40 HS versus Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the SX40 HS (12MP) and the Z981 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX40 HS was released 15 months after the Z981 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the SX40 HS scores vs the Z981 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX40 HS and Kodak EasyShare Z981. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX40 HS Gallery and Kodak Z981 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX40 HS over the Kodak Z981
SX40 HS | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 15 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 201k | Clearer display (+29k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Canon SX40 HS
Z981 | SX40 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Canon SX40 HS and Kodak Z981
SX40 HS | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX40 HS enjoys physical measurements of 123mm x 92mm x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Kodak Z981 has dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX40 HS versus Kodak Z981 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the SX40 HS against the Z981.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f67c0/f67c07783bbdadf466b53a27d3debdeba01673ef" alt="Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 size comparison Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SX40 HS and Z981 is 64 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10419/10419985c99fe2dc9d40eaadba2330dca325f03f" alt="Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 top view buttons comparison Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX40 HS and Z981.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Kodak Z981 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent SX40 HS provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efc7c/efc7c0b2f40d675e92966f3d5fdec776d87af0e6" alt="Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 sensor size comparison Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff6a7/ff6a7d3bb92adb0063c0a6700599118c1524c2d2" alt="Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX40 HS vs Kodak Z981 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Kodak |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | Kodak EasyShare Z981 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.7-5.8 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | PureColor II VA TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 6.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 540g (1.19 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 92 x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-10L | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $330 | $299 |