Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500
64 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
70 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-840mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 600g - 123 x 92 x 108mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Superseded the Canon SX30 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Released October 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-510
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Canon SX40 HS and Olympus E-500, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the SX40 HS (12MP) and E-500 (8MP) and the SX40 HS (1/2.3") and E-500 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX40 HS was unveiled 5 years later than the E-500 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon SX40 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX40 HS scores versus the E-500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX40 HS & Olympus E-500. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX40 HS Gallery & Olympus E-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX40 HS over the Olympus E-500
SX40 HS | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | October 2005 | Fresher by 72 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Canon SX40 HS
E-500 | SX40 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX40 HS and Olympus E-500
SX40 HS | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX40 HS provides outside measurements of 123mm x 92mm x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-500 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX40 HS and Olympus E-500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SX40 HS compared to the E-500.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX40 HS and E-500 is 64 and 70 respectively.
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX40 HS and E-500.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SX40 HS using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Canon SX40 HS will show greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger SX40 HS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | Olympus E-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | Olympus E-500 |
Also called as | - | EVOLT E-500 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2005-10-21 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 8 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3264 x 2448 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.7-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 215k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | PureColor II VA TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.45x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 479g (1.06 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 92 x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-10L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $330 | $600 |