Clicky

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500

Portability
64
Imaging
36
Features
50
Overall
41
Canon PowerShot SX40 HS front
 
Olympus E-500 front
Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs

Canon SX40 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-840mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
  • 600g - 123 x 92 x 108mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Superseded the Canon SX30 IS
  • Newer Model is Canon SX50 HS
Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Released October 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-500
  • Updated by Olympus E-510
Photography Glossary

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Canon SX40 HS and Olympus E-500, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the SX40 HS (12MP) and E-500 (8MP) and the SX40 HS (1/2.3") and E-500 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The SX40 HS was unveiled 5 years later than the E-500 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon SX40 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX40 HS scores versus the E-500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX40 HS over the Olympus E-500

 SX40 HS E-500 
ReleasedSeptember 2011October 2005Fresher by 72 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Canon SX40 HS

 E-500 SX40 HS 

Common features in the Canon SX40 HS and Olympus E-500

 SX40 HS E-500 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Touch display No Touch display

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX40 HS provides outside measurements of 123mm x 92mm x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-500 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon SX40 HS and Olympus E-500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the SX40 HS compared to the E-500.

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX40 HS and E-500 is 64 and 70 respectively.

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX40 HS and E-500.

As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SX40 HS using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Canon SX40 HS will show greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger SX40 HS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 sensor size comparison

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX40 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
41
you can focus manually
great flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
features face detect focus
low resolution (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
49
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon SX40 HS Street photography factors
Olympus E-500 Street photography factors
49
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition (600 grams)
57
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average in class (479g)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon SX40 HS Sports photography details
Olympus E-500 Sports photography details
43
amazing zoom range (24-840mm 35.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good battery (380 per charge)
low resolution (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon SX40 HS
Travel photography with Olympus E-500
55
good battery (380 CIPA)
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
fairly wide (24mm)
great reach (840mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (600g)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
52
lighter than average in class (479g)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX40 HS Landscape photography information
Olympus E-500 Landscape photography information
38
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good battery (380 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inches)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
does not have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX40 HS as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-500 as a Vlogging camera
57
fairly wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than competition (600 grams)
9
can't record video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus E-500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX40 HS and Olympus E-500
 Canon PowerShot SX40 HSOlympus E-500
General Information
Brand Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot SX40 HS Olympus E-500
Also called as - EVOLT E-500
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2011-09-15 2005-10-21
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 8 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 3264 x 2448
Highest native ISO 3200 400
Highest enhanced ISO - 1600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 9 3
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 24-840mm (35.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.7-5.8 -
Macro focusing distance 0cm -
Number of lenses - 45
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 2.5"
Resolution of display 230k dots 215k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology PureColor II VA TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.45x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 13.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/2000 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 600g (1.32 pounds) 479g (1.06 pounds)
Physical dimensions 123 x 92 x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-10L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $330 $600