Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
64 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-840mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 600g - 123 x 92 x 108mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Older Model is Canon SX30 IS
- Replacement is Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- New Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Let's look closer at the Canon SX40 HS versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX40 HS (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX40 HS was announced 20 months later than the SP-800 UZ making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX40 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SX40 HS matches up vs the SP-800 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX40 HS & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX40 HS Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX40 HS over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
SX40 HS | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | February 2010 | More recent by 20 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Canon SX40 HS
SP-800 UZ | SX40 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Canon SX40 HS and Olympus SP-800 UZ
SX40 HS | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX40 HS features physical measurements of 123mm x 92mm x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX40 HS versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the SX40 HS vs the SP-800 UZ.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX40 HS and SP-800 UZ is 64 and 69 respectively.
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The graphic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX40 HS and SP-800 UZ.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus SP-800 UZ to produce extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent SX40 HS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX40 HS vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.7-5.8 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | PureColor II VA TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 12 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 lbs) | 455g (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 92 x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-10L | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $330 | $270 |