Canon SX40 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1
64 Imaging
35 Features
50 Overall
41
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon SX40 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-840mm (F2.7-5.8) lens
- 600g - 123 x 92 x 108mm
- Launched September 2011
- Older Model is Canon SX30 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX40 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Canon SX40 HS and Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SX40 HS (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty close and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX40 HS was revealed 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX40 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the SX40 HS grades vs the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Canon SX40 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX40 HS and Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are available at Canon SX40 HS Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX40 HS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SX40 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon SX40 HS
| WG-M1 | SX40 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 | September 2011 | More recent by 36 months |
Common features in the Canon SX40 HS and Ricoh WG-M1
| SX40 HS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX40 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX40 HS enjoys outer measurements of 123mm x 92mm x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX40 HS and Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the SX40 HS compared to the WG-M1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX40 HS and WG-M1 is 64 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX40 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The graphic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX40 HS and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to render greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older SX40 HS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX40 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX40 HS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX40 HS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-09-15 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.7-5.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II VA TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 92 x 108mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 4.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-10L | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $330 | $2,000 |