Clicky

Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200

Portability
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front
Portability
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41

Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs

Canon SX400 IS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
  • 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
  • Revealed July 2014
Fujifilm S9200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Announced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview

Following is a in-depth comparison of the Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the SX400 IS (16MP) and the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The SX400 IS was brought out 7 months after the Fujifilm S9200 and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX400 IS being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SX400 IS scores versus the Fujifilm S9200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Fujifilm S9200

          

          

            
 SX400 IS Fujifilm S9200 
AnnouncedJuly 2014January 2014More modern by 7 months
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Canon SX400 IS

          

          

            
 Fujifilm S9200 SX400 IS 
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Fujifilm S9200

          

          

            
 SX400 IS Fujifilm S9200 
Manual focus  Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen  Lack of Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX400 IS offers exterior dimensions of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Fujifilm S9200 has proportions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check the Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SX400 IS vs the Fujifilm S9200.
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 size comparison
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX400 IS and Fujifilm S9200 is 81 and 61 respectively.
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The pic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX400 IS and Fujifilm S9200.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you should expect comparable quality of pictures however you should consider the production date  of the cameras into account. The more modern SX400 IS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

            Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Photography Glossary        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX400 IS Portrait photography advice
Fujifilm S9200 Portrait photography advice
35
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 offers face detection autofocus
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 no external flash support
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
36
 decent MP (16MP)
 has face detect autofocus
 focusing manually not possible
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX400 IS
Street photography with Fujifilm S9200
52
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
41
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 heavier than others (670 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
Canon SX400 IS Sports photography features
Fujifilm S9200 Sports photography features
42
 incredible zoom range (24-720mm  30.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 offers tracking autofocus
 low frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 low battery life (190 CIPA)
 lacks phase detect autofocus
55
 incredible zoom range (24-1200mm  50.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 decent MP (16MP)
 has tracking focus
 good battery pack (500 shots)
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Travel Comparison
Canon SX400 IS Travel photography factors
Fujifilm S9200 Travel photography factors
60
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 built-in flash
 pretty wide (24mm)
 very long reach (720mm)
 lack of Timelapse mode
 low battery life (190 per charge)
 does not feature selfie friendly screen
 sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
54
 good battery pack (500 per charge)
 decent MP (16MP)
 built-in flash
 rather wide (24mm)
 long zoom (1200mm)
 no Time Lapse recording
 heavier than others (670 grams)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX400 IS
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9200
40
 pretty wide (24mm)
 screen is a decent size (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 no manual focus
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
 no manual control
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
 low battery life (190 shots)
 lack of Timelapse mode
44
 rather wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 decent MP (16MP)
 good battery pack (500 CIPA)
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 no Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX400 IS Vlogging factors
Fujifilm S9200 Vlogging factors
28
 pretty wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 offers face detection autofocus
 sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
 does not feature selfie friendly screen
 low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
 lack of external microphone jack
26
 rather wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 has face detect autofocus
 high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 no mic port
 heavier than others (670 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
        
                
        

          

            
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX400 IS and Fujifilm S9200
 Canon PowerShot SX400 ISFujifilm FinePix S9200
General Information
Brand Canon FujiFilm
Model Canon PowerShot SX400 IS Fujifilm FinePix S9200
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2014-07-29 2014-01-06
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Digic 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-720mm (30.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.4-5.8 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus distance 0cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 201k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 97 percent
Features
Min shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/1700 secs
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 5.00 m 7.00 m
Flash options Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 313g (0.69 lbs) 670g (1.48 lbs)
Dimensions 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 190 pictures 500 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack AA
Battery model NB-11LH 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $229 $300