Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7378f/7378f1a25ab0839deef971ff6a08ab4eed615d16" alt="Canon PowerShot SX400 IS front Canon PowerShot SX400 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58ad8/58ad8beaf10ab1e997eee3fd9d70d871d24d2ac7" alt="Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front Fujifilm FinePix S9200 front"
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Revealed July 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the SX400 IS (16MP) and the Fujifilm S9200 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SX400 IS was brought out 7 months after the Fujifilm S9200 and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX400 IS being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SX400 IS scores versus the Fujifilm S9200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS and Fujifilm FinePix S9200. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX400 IS Gallery and Fujifilm S9200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Fujifilm S9200
SX400 IS | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2014 | ![]() | January 2014 | More modern by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9200 over the Canon SX400 IS
Fujifilm S9200 | SX400 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Fujifilm S9200
SX400 IS | Fujifilm S9200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX400 IS offers exterior dimensions of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Fujifilm S9200 has proportions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check the Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SX400 IS vs the Fujifilm S9200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bb8c/9bb8c04bd83429dd69826fbf44249a3df00b1b6c" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 size comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX400 IS and Fujifilm S9200 is 81 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ecc3/2ecc37b5ef187bd932cd28e027dc4b5a66f3bf97" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 top view buttons comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The pic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX400 IS and Fujifilm S9200.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you should expect comparable quality of pictures however you should consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more modern SX400 IS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33246/332468ff571ba6a4bbd6e475a63cf3302639d5fb" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 sensor size comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cc5d/4cc5d78422402f6af24493ca127684d64032deeb" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX400 IS vs Fujifilm S9200 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix S9200 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-07-29 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1700 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 7.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lbs) | 670g (1.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 pictures | 500 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | NB-11LH | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $229 | $300 |