Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7378f/7378f1a25ab0839deef971ff6a08ab4eed615d16" alt="Canon PowerShot SX400 IS front Canon PowerShot SX400 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ea1a/5ea1a2dcd0db3a5f518a33b0c5b509e82763f6fa" alt="Kodak Easyshare M5370 front Kodak Easyshare M5370 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Released July 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed September 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Canon SX400 IS and Kodak Easyshare M5370, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the SX400 IS (16MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SX400 IS was brought out 2 years after the Easyshare M5370 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SX400 IS grades against the Easyshare M5370 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX400 IS Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
SX400 IS | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2014 | ![]() | September 2011 | Newer by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Canon SX400 IS
Easyshare M5370 | SX400 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Kodak Easyshare M5370
SX400 IS | Easyshare M5370 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX400 IS enjoys exterior measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Canon SX400 IS and Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SX400 IS vs the Easyshare M5370.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38080/380807fe22057ffea5a96696438a9411e114060b" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SX400 IS and Easyshare M5370 is 81 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c41e/0c41e5a7ace8deafe8ddd5a1b4053eeee7cdfa4b" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The picture underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX400 IS and Easyshare M5370.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP so you can expect similar quality of files however you need to take the age of the products into consideration. The more modern SX400 IS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4354/d43541fa685d933b2eb80ec74fc3a751946f7408" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a34c3/a34c3f1fe189c179804ff307862276755fdbf234" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Kodak |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-07-29 | 2011-09-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-1, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lbs) | 150g (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11LH | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $229 | $160 |