Clicky

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

Portability
81
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS front
 
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
Portability
65
Imaging
46
Features
56
Overall
50

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs

Canon SX400 IS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
  • 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
  • Introduced July 2014
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and Kodak. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the SX400 IS (16MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SX400 IS was unveiled 7 months after the Astro Zoom AZ651 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX400 IS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SX400 IS scores vs the Astro Zoom AZ651 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 SX400 IS Astro Zoom AZ651 
IntroducedJuly 2014January 2014More modern by 7 months

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Canon SX400 IS

 Astro Zoom AZ651 SX400 IS 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 SX400 IS Astro Zoom AZ651 
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon SX400 IS has got external measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has sizing of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).

Look at the Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the SX400 IS and the Astro Zoom AZ651.

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SX400 IS and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 81 and 65 respectively.

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX400 IS and Astro Zoom AZ651.

Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to offer you extra detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern SX400 IS provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 sensor size comparison

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX400 IS Portrait photography advice
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography advice
36
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
54
you can focus manually
good megapixels (21 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Canon SX400 IS Street photography highlights
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography highlights
52
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
59
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (567g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Canon SX400 IS Sports photography info
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sports photography info
42
excellent zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery (190 CIPA)
does not have phase detect AF
51
excellent zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (21MP)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Canon SX400 IS Travel photography info
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography info
60
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (720mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low battery (190 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.4)
60
good megapixels (21MP)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
fairly wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1560mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (567g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX400 IS Landscape photography highlights
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography highlights
41
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
low battery (190 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
54
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (21MP)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX400 IS as a Vlogging camera
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Vlogging camera
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
slow max aperture (f3.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
60
fairly wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
lack of mic jack
heavier than average in class (567 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX400 IS vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX400 IS and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
 Canon PowerShot SX400 ISKodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
General Information
Make Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot SX400 IS Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2014-07-29 2014-01-07
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Digic 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 21MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-720mm (30.0x) 24-1560mm (65.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.4-5.8 f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus range 0cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s -
Maximum shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m -
Flash options Auto, on, off, slow synchro -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 313g (0.69 lb) 567g (1.25 lb)
Physical dimensions 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 190 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11LH -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $229 $419