Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
81 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Revealed July 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Canon SX400 IS and Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the SX400 IS (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX400 IS was introduced 19 months later than the TG-630 iHS which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SX400 IS grades versus the TG-630 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX400 IS Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SX400 IS | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2014 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Canon SX400 IS
| TG-630 iHS | SX400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| SX400 IS | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX400 IS enjoys outside measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has specifications of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX400 IS and Olympus TG-630 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the SX400 IS vs the TG-630 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX400 IS and TG-630 iHS is 81 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX400 IS and TG-630 iHS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Canon SX400 IS to offer greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer SX400 IS should have an edge in sensor tech.
Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2014-07-29 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 313 gr (0.69 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 images | 220 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $229 | $200 |
