Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
81 Imaging
39 Features
31 Overall
35
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Released July 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX400 IS (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX400 IS was unveiled 19 months after the TG-830 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SX400 IS grades versus the TG-830 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are available at Canon SX400 IS Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| SX400 IS | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2014 | January 2013 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Canon SX400 IS
| TG-830 iHS | SX400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| SX400 IS | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon SX400 IS has got external dimensions of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SX400 IS compared to the TG-830 iHS.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX400 IS and TG-830 iHS is 81 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through specifications. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX400 IS and TG-830 iHS.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP so you can expect similar quality of images although you may want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer SX400 IS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Canon SX400 IS vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-07-29 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 313 gr (0.69 pounds) | 214 gr (0.47 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photos | 300 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $229 | $0 |