Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Announced July 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the SX400 IS (16MP) and the GR (16MP) is fairly close but the SX400 IS (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX400 IS was announced 16 months later than the GR making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX400 IS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SX400 IS grades vs the GR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS & Ricoh GR. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX400 IS Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Ricoh GR
| SX400 IS | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2014 |  | April 2013 | Fresher by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Canon SX400 IS
| GR | SX400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Ricoh GR
| SX400 IS | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX400 IS provides external measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the SX400 IS vs the GR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX400 IS and GR is 81 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX400 IS and GR.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer the same exact megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The SX400 IS features the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher. The newer SX400 IS provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Ricoh GR |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-07-29 | 2013-04-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 300s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 313g (0.69 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 pictures | 290 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11LH | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $229 | $971 |