Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Revealed July 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX400 IS (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the SX400 IS (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") possess different sensor measurements.

The SX400 IS was revealed 5 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the SX400 IS matches up against the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS & Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are available at Canon SX400 IS Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Ricoh GR Digital III
SX400 IS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 61 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Canon SX400 IS
GR Digital III | SX400 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Ricoh GR Digital III
SX400 IS | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX400 IS comes with outer measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the SX400 IS and the GR Digital III.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX400 IS and GR Digital III is 81 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The picture here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX400 IS and GR Digital III.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SX400 IS using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Canon SX400 IS will render extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern SX400 IS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-07-29 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4+ | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lb) | 208g (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-11LH | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $229 | $399 |