Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Introduced July 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the SX400 IS (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the SX400 IS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") feature different sensor dimensions.

The SX400 IS was announced 2 years later than the GR Digital IV and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the SX400 IS scores against the GR Digital IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX400 IS Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX400 IS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2014 | ![]() | September 2011 | Fresher by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX400 IS
GR Digital IV | SX400 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX400 IS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX400 IS comes with outside measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the SX400 IS against the GR Digital IV.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX400 IS and GR Digital IV is 81 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX400 IS and GR Digital IV.
All in all, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SX400 IS with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Canon SX400 IS will give you extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent SX400 IS provides an edge in sensor tech.

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-07-29 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 4+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 shots | 390 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-11LH | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $229 | $599 |