Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR II
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
89 Imaging
58 Features
55 Overall
56
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Launched July 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR
Photography Glossary Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR II, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SX400 IS (16MP) and the GR II (16MP) is relatively comparable but the SX400 IS (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX400 IS was launched 10 months earlier than the GR II so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX400 IS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SX400 IS scores versus the GR II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS and Ricoh GR II. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX400 IS Gallery and Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Ricoh GR II
| SX400 IS | GR II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Canon SX400 IS
| GR II | SX400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2015 | July 2014 | More recent by 10 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Ricoh GR II
| SX400 IS | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon SX400 IS features outside dimensions of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the SX400 IS versus the GR II.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX400 IS and GR II is 81 and 89 respectively.
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The photograph underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX400 IS and GR II.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor measurements. The SX400 IS uses the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier. The older SX400 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Ricoh GR II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Ricoh GR II |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-07-29 | 2015-06-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4+ | GR Engine V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/2.8-16.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 300s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 313g (0.69 lb) | 251g (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1078 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 shots | 320 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11LH | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $229 | $599 |