Clicky

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50

Portability
81
Imaging
40
Features
31
Overall
36
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS front
 
Ricoh WG-50 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
39
Overall
40

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs

Canon SX400 IS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
  • 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
  • Announced July 2014
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Revealed May 2017
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview

Following is a in-depth comparison of the Canon SX400 IS versus Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SX400 IS (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SX400 IS was unveiled 3 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SX400 IS scores against the WG-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Ricoh WG-50

 SX400 IS WG-50 
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Canon SX400 IS

 WG-50 SX400 IS 
RevealedMay 2017July 2014More modern by 34 months
Manual focus More accurate focus

Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Ricoh WG-50

 SX400 IS WG-50 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX400 IS enjoys outside measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check out the Canon SX400 IS versus Ricoh WG-50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the SX400 IS compared to the WG-50.

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX400 IS and WG-50 is 81 and 91 respectively.

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The image underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX400 IS and WG-50.

All in all, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP so you should expect similar quality of files although you would want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged SX400 IS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX400 IS
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-50
35
decent MP (16MP)
features face detect autofocus
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
41
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon SX400 IS Street photography details
Ricoh WG-50 Street photography details
52
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
62
built in image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Canon SX400 IS Sports photography highlights
Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography highlights
42
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery (190 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
49
built in image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon SX400 IS Travel photography information
Ricoh WG-50 Travel photography information
60
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (720mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
bad battery (190 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
71
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon SX400 IS
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-50
40
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
lack of manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
bad battery (190 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse recording
48
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX400 IS as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Vlogging camera
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic support
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
offers face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX400 IS and Ricoh WG-50
 Canon PowerShot SX400 ISRicoh WG-50
General Information
Company Canon Ricoh
Model Canon PowerShot SX400 IS Ricoh WG-50
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Announced 2014-07-29 2017-05-24
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Digic 4+ -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-720mm (30.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.4-5.8 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance 0cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/1600s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per second 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, on, off, slow synchro On, off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 313 grams (0.69 lb) 193 grams (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 190 pictures 300 pictures
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-11LH D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $229 $280