Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-80
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Released July 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-70
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Canon SX400 IS and Ricoh WG-80, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the SX400 IS (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX400 IS was revealed 8 years before the WG-80 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SX400 IS grades vs the WG-80 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS and Ricoh WG-80. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX400 IS Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Ricoh WG-80
| SX400 IS | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Canon SX400 IS
| WG-80 | SX400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2022 |  | July 2014 | More recent by 95 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Ricoh WG-80
| SX400 IS | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon SX400 IS comes with outer measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX400 IS and Ricoh WG-80 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the SX400 IS compared to the WG-80.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX400 IS and WG-80 is 81 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The graphic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX400 IS and WG-80.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of files although you should really factor the production date of the cameras into account. The older SX400 IS will be behind in sensor innovation.
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX400 IS vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-07-29 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.70" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 313g (0.69 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11LH | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $229 | $300 |