Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7378f/7378f1a25ab0839deef971ff6a08ab4eed615d16" alt="Canon PowerShot SX400 IS front Canon PowerShot SX400 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a851/5a851ef78e48f8e044878a725f768ce7cb93cf0c" alt="Samsung GX-1L front Samsung GX-1L front"
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Revealed July 2014
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released February 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Canon SX400 IS and Samsung GX-1L, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Canon and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX400 IS (16MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the SX400 IS (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX400 IS was manufactured 8 years later than the GX-1L and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX400 IS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SX400 IS scores vs the GX-1L for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS and Samsung GX-1L. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX400 IS Gallery and Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Samsung GX-1L
SX400 IS | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2014 | ![]() | February 2006 | Fresher by 103 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Canon SX400 IS
GX-1L | SX400 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Samsung GX-1L
SX400 IS | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX400 IS has got exterior measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1L has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX400 IS and Samsung GX-1L in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the SX400 IS versus the GX-1L.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b818/7b81821872654af73f6f52afba39838e58725826" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX400 IS and GX-1L is 81 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98d4a/98d4a4108ce1c30d02bbeab88611c5cd146a102a" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX400 IS and GX-1L.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SX400 IS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Canon SX400 IS will provide you with more detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger SX400 IS provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bbe7/3bbe7118c165efaac41ab48245a430d60a4aa79c" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison"
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ab59/1ab59f74988666dfc0ec25b866234dda52a6604a" alt="Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Samsung GX-1L | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Samsung GX-1L |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2014-07-29 | 2006-02-24 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 6MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 5 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 0cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 7.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lbs) | 570g (1.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11LH | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $229 | $0 |