Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL102
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Introduced July 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Canon SX400 IS versus Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the SX400 IS (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX400 IS was released 5 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the SX400 IS scores versus the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX400 IS Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Samsung SL102
| SX400 IS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 68 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Canon SX400 IS
| SL102 | SX400 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Samsung SL102
| SX400 IS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX400 IS has got exterior measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX400 IS versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the SX400 IS against the SL102.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX400 IS and SL102 is 81 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SX400 IS and SL102.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Canon SX400 IS to give greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer SX400 IS will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-07-29 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 313 gr (0.69 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $229 | $130 |