Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL620
81 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Revealed July 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also Known as PL65
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Canon SX400 IS and Samsung SL620, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the SX400 IS (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX400 IS was brought out 5 years later than the SL620 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX400 IS being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SX400 IS grades versus the SL620 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS and Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX400 IS Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Samsung SL620
| SX400 IS | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2014 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 67 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Canon SX400 IS
| SL620 | SX400 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Samsung SL620
| SX400 IS | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX400 IS has outer dimensions of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Canon SX400 IS and Samsung SL620 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the SX400 IS versus the SL620.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX400 IS and SL620 is 81 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specs. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX400 IS and SL620.
All in all, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Canon SX400 IS to show extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher SX400 IS should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX400 IS vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called as | - | PL65 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-07-29 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 313 gr (0.69 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $229 | $200 |