Canon SX400 IS vs Sony H200
Portability
81 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
81 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
Portability
67 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
67 Imaging
45 Features
31 Overall
39
Canon SX400 IS vs Sony H200 Key Specs
Canon SX400 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 313g - 104 x 69 x 80mm
- Released July 2014
Sony H200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Launched January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX400 IS vs Sony H200 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Canon SX400 IS versus Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SX400 IS (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX400 IS was brought out 19 months after the H200 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Canon SX400 IS being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SX400 IS matches up vs the H200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX400 IS vs Sony H200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX400 IS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX400 IS Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX400 IS over the Sony H200
| SX400 IS | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Canon SX400 IS
| H200 | SX400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX400 IS and Sony H200
| SX400 IS | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Canon SX400 IS vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX400 IS enjoys physical measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX400 IS versus Sony H200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SX400 IS against the H200.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX400 IS and H200 is 81 and 67 respectively.
Canon SX400 IS vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The picture underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SX400 IS and H200.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony H200 to give more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer SX400 IS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX400 IS vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX400 IS as a Portrait photography camera
Sony H200 as a Portrait photography camera
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
MP count good (20MP)
offers face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Canon SX400 IS as a Street photography camera
Sony H200 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than average in class (530 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX400 IS
Sports photography with Sony H200
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (190 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (240 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Canon SX400 IS Travel photography details
Sony H200 Travel photography details
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (720mm)
missing Timelapse recording
terrible battery (190 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.4)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (633mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
terrible battery (240 per charge)
heavier than average in class (530g)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Canon SX400 IS Landscape photography details
Sony H200 Landscape photography details
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
terrible battery (190 per charge)
missing Timelapse recording
decently wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
terrible battery (240 shots)
lack of Time Lapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX400 IS
Vlogging with Sony H200
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
slow max aperture (f3.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone jack
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
heavier than average in class (530 grams)
Photography Glossary
Canon SX400 IS vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX400 IS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-07-29 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 20cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 313 gr (0.69 lb) | 530 gr (1.17 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 69 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | NB-11LH | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $229 | $250 |