Canon SX410 IS vs Nikon S800c
80 Imaging
45 Features
33 Overall
40
93 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Canon SX410 IS vs Nikon S800c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-960mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 325g - 104 x 69 x 85mm
- Revealed February 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Released February 2013
Canon SX410 IS vs Nikon S800c Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Canon SX410 IS vs Nikon S800c, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Nikon. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the SX410 IS (20MP) and S800c (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX410 IS was released 2 years after the S800c which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SX410 IS scores against the S800c in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon SX410 IS vs Nikon S800c Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX410 IS & Nikon Coolpix S800c. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX410 IS Gallery & Nikon S800c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX410 IS over the Nikon S800c
SX410 IS | S800c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | February 2013 | Newer by 25 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Canon SX410 IS
S800c | SX410 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 819k | 230k | Crisper screen (+589k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX410 IS and Nikon S800c
SX410 IS | S800c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Canon SX410 IS vs Nikon S800c Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX410 IS has got physical measurements of 104mm x 69mm x 85mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.3") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Nikon S800c has dimensions of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX410 IS vs Nikon S800c in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the SX410 IS versus the S800c.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SX410 IS and S800c is 80 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX410 IS vs Nikon S800c Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The pic here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX410 IS and S800c.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Canon SX410 IS to offer more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern SX410 IS should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX410 IS vs Nikon S800c Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX410 IS vs Nikon S800c Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS | Nikon Coolpix S800c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Nikon |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX410 IS | Nikon Coolpix S800c |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2013-02-04 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 4+ | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 819k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 0.5 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, slow synchro, flash off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325 grams (0.72 pounds) | 184 grams (0.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 104 x 69 x 85mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 3.3") | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 185 images | 140 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-11LH | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $199 | $290 |