Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z16
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Released January 2013
- Succeeded the Canon SX40 HS
- Successor is Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced September 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Overview
Let's look closer at the Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z16, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the EX-Z16 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX50 HS was unveiled 2 years later than the EX-Z16 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SX50 HS matches up against the EX-Z16 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS & Casio Exilim EX-Z16. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX50 HS Gallery & Casio EX-Z16 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Casio EX-Z16
| SX50 HS | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | September 2010 | Fresher by 29 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 2.8" | " | Bigger screen (+2.8") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 0k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Canon SX50 HS
| EX-Z16 | SX50 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Casio EX-Z16
| SX50 HS | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX50 HS features physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") and a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z16 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the SX50 HS compared to the EX-Z16.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX50 HS and EX-Z16 is 65 and 99 respectively.
Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX50 HS and EX-Z16.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures although you should take the age of the products into consideration. The more recent SX50 HS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z16 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-01-15 | 2010-09-20 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.8 inch | - |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 202k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 848x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 595g (1.31 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-10L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $429 | $100 |