Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z270
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43


96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Announced January 2013
- Previous Model is Canon SX40 HS
- Successor is Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009

Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Canon SX50 HS versus Casio EX-Z270, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the EX-Z270 (10MP) is very well matched but the SX50 HS (1/2.3") and EX-Z270 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor measurements.

The SX50 HS was revealed 4 years after the EX-Z270 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the SX50 HS scores versus the EX-Z270 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Casio Exilim EX-Z270. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX50 HS Gallery and Casio EX-Z270 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Casio EX-Z270
SX50 HS | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 49 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 2.8" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.1") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper display (+346k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Canon SX50 HS
EX-Z270 | SX50 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Casio EX-Z270
SX50 HS | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX50 HS comes with outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") with a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z270 has proportions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX50 HS versus Casio EX-Z270 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the SX50 HS and the EX-Z270.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX50 HS and EX-Z270 is 65 and 96 respectively.

Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through specifications. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX50 HS and EX-Z270.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SX50 HS with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Canon SX50 HS will give you extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer SX50 HS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-Z270 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-01-15 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.6-7.8 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 202 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 1/2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595 gr (1.31 lb) | 111 gr (0.24 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-10L | NP-80 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $429 | $0 |