Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S3200
Portability
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Key Specs
Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX40 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX60 HS
FujiFilm S3200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix S3250
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Canon SX50 HS and FujiFilm S3200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the S3200 (14MP) is pretty similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX50 HS was manufactured 2 years later than the S3200 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the SX50 HS scores against the S3200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and FujiFilm FinePix S3200. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX50 HS Gallery and FujiFilm S3200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the FujiFilm S3200
| SX50 HS | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Canon SX50 HS
| S3200 | SX50 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and FujiFilm S3200
| SX50 HS | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX50 HS has got outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") along with a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S3200 has dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
See the Canon SX50 HS and FujiFilm S3200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the SX50 HS versus the S3200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX50 HS and S3200 is 65 and 67 respectively.
Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SX50 HS and S3200.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the FujiFilm S3200 to offer you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger SX50 HS is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon SX50 HS
Portrait photography with FujiFilm S3200
has manual focus
above average flash sync (1/2,000s)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX50 HS
Street photography with FujiFilm S3200
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than competition in class (595 grams)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (540 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Sports photography advice
FujiFilm S3200 Sports photography advice
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking focus
low frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
slow fps (1.0 fps)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Canon SX50 HS as a Travel photography camera
FujiFilm S3200 as a Travel photography camera
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (595g)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (576mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (540 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Landscape photography highlights
FujiFilm S3200 Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (2.8 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse function
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX50 HS Vlogging details
FujiFilm S3200 Vlogging details
reasonably wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not have mic support
heavier than competition in class (595 grams)
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (540 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX50 HS vs FujiFilm S3200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 |
| Also called as | - | FinePix S3250 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-15 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-576mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 202k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 595g (1.31 lb) | 540g (1.19 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 179 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photos | 300 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | NB-10L | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $429 | $190 |
