Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
![Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS/Canon-SX50-HS-front.jpg)
![Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 front Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W3/Fujifilm-Real-3D-W3-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Announced January 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX40 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Introduced August 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Canon SX50 HS versus Fujifilm Real 3D W3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The SX50 HS was released 2 years later than the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the SX50 HS scores vs the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS & Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX50 HS Gallery & Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
SX50 HS | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2010 | More recent by 30 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Canon SX50 HS
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | SX50 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Display resolution | 1150k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+689k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Fujifilm Real 3D W3
SX50 HS | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX50 HS has outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") along with a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) while the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has specifications of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX50 HS versus Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SX50 HS against the Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
![Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 size comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W3-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX50 HS and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is 65 and 90 respectively.
![Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 top view buttons comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W3-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX50 HS and Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Canon SX50 HS to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern SX50 HS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 sensor size comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W3-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-Real-3D-W3-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX50 HS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-15 | 2010-08-17 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 5 | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.7-4.2 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.8 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 1,150 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 202 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | 3.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595 gr (1.31 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-10L | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $429 | $900 |