Clicky

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III

Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
55
Overall
43
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs

Canon SX50 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
  • 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
  • Revealed January 2013
  • Previous Model is Canon SX40 HS
  • Refreshed by Canon SX60 HS
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Released February 2020
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX50 HS and Olympus E-M1 III, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the SX50 HS (12MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the SX50 HS (1/2.3") and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SX50 HS was released 8 years earlier than the E-M1 III and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SX50 HS grades versus the E-M1 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

				

Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Olympus E-M1 III

 SX50 HS E-M1 III 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Canon SX50 HS

 E-M1 III SX50 HS 
ReleasedFebruary 2020January 2013More recent by 86 months
Screen dimensions3"2.8"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution1037k461kCrisper screen (+576k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Olympus E-M1 III

 SX50 HS E-M1 III 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated screen
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX50 HS features outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") with a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 III has measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).

Compare the Canon SX50 HS and Olympus E-M1 III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the SX50 HS and the E-M1 III.

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX50 HS and E-M1 III is 65 and 67 respectively.

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III top view buttons comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The photograph below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX50 HS and E-M1 III.

All in all, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SX50 HS due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 III will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older SX50 HS will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III sensor size comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX50 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 III
48
you can focus manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/2,000s)
comes with face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
77
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Street photography factors
Olympus E-M1 III Street photography factors
57
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (595g)
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
boasts touch focus
environment sealing
very good high ISO (25,600)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Canon SX50 HS as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M1 III as a Sports photography camera
39
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
81
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography factors
53
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
quite wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (595 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
79
environment sealing
supports bluetooth
boasts touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography factors
45
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (2.8 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
81
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
has double storage slots
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX50 HS Vlogging features
Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging features
58
quite wide (24mm)
display is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (595g)
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focusing
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX50 HS and Olympus E-M1 III
 Canon PowerShot SX50 HSOlympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
General Information
Company Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Pro Mirrorless
Revealed 2013-01-15 2020-02-11
Body design SLR-like (bridge) SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 5 TruePic IX
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 6400 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 121
Cross focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.4-6.5 -
Macro focus range 0cm -
Number of lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 2.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 461k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 202k dot 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/8000s
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps 60.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.50 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/2000s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1920x1080 4096x2160
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 595g (1.31 lb) 580g (1.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 47 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 179 not tested
Other
Battery life 315 shots 420 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-10L BLH-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot)
Storage slots 1 Dual
Launch cost $429 $1,800