Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a4d/60a4dab016451a3a4719c41906c42e23c6bca8ea" alt="Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/022ed/022ed39c86a4f12fb37f0ee7bf73ec9c47fc264c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-1 front Olympus Stylus SH-1 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX40 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Canon SX50 HS versus Olympus SH-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the SX50 HS (12MP) and SH-1 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SX50 HS was introduced 14 months before the SH-1 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the SX50 HS matches up vs the SH-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS & Olympus Stylus SH-1. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX50 HS Gallery & Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Olympus SH-1
SX50 HS | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Canon SX50 HS
SH-1 | SX50 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 14 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Olympus SH-1
SX50 HS | SH-1 |
---|
Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX50 HS features exterior dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") and a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Olympus SH-1 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX50 HS versus Olympus SH-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the SX50 HS and the SH-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae4e5/ae4e56f72764ff6e4ed57426d1bad7b3402c4e0b" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX50 HS and SH-1 is 65 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d7ff/6d7ff7426125701561090f8b252700af2bcce1cc" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX50 HS and SH-1.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus SH-1 to render extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older SX50 HS will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46fac/46fac8ae8e2d620a36069a397abdb50c206648df" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b81f/9b81f86a09b0597db49905ee1731a94feb5b1074" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-15 | 2014-03-31 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 5 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 202k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 595 grams (1.31 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photos | 380 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-10L | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $429 | $349 |