Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic LX100 II
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43


81 Imaging
57 Features
75 Overall
64
Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic LX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX40 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 17MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 392g - 115 x 66 x 64mm
- Launched August 2018
- Superseded the Panasonic LX100

Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic LX100 II Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic LX100 II, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX50 HS (12MP) and LX100 II (17MP) and the SX50 HS (1/2.3") and LX100 II (Four Thirds) feature different sensor size.

The SX50 HS was unveiled 6 years prior to the LX100 II and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic LX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SX50 HS matches up versus the LX100 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic LX100 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX50 HS Gallery and Panasonic LX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Panasonic LX100 II
SX50 HS | LX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic LX100 II over the Canon SX50 HS
LX100 II | SX50 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2018 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 68 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper screen (+779k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Panasonic LX100 II
SX50 HS | LX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic LX100 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX50 HS provides outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") and a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Panasonic LX100 II has measurements of 115mm x 66mm x 64mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 2.5") having a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic LX100 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the SX50 HS compared to the LX100 II.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX50 HS and LX100 II is 65 and 81 respectively.

Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic LX100 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The visual below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX50 HS and LX100 II.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SX50 HS with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic LX100 II will render greater detail having an extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older SX50 HS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic LX100 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic LX100 II Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Panasonic |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-15 | 2018-08-22 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 5 | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 17 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4736 x 3552 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-75mm (3.1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/1.7-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 202 thousand dot | 2,760 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 1800s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DMW-BLE9 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595g (1.31 lbs) | 392g (0.86 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 115 x 66 x 64mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photographs | 340 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-10L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $429 | $998 |