Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a4d/60a4dab016451a3a4719c41906c42e23c6bca8ea" alt="Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Previous Model is Canon SX40 HS
- Updated by Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Let's look more closely at the Canon SX50 HS versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively well matched but the SX50 HS (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SX50 HS was launched 17 months later than the GR Digital IV which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX50 HS scores versus the GR Digital IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX50 HS Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX50 HS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | Fresher by 17 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Canon SX50 HS
GR Digital IV | SX50 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Ricoh GR Digital IV
SX50 HS | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon SX50 HS offers outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") and a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX50 HS versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the SX50 HS compared to the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdb4f/cdb4fd9270fe0a4471bb3877d69630c38eb2574f" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SX50 HS and GR Digital IV is 65 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ca7/29ca741e59c976caf4f159a2245705d546597928" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX50 HS and GR Digital IV.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SX50 HS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Canon SX50 HS will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger SX50 HS should have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3967a/3967a30d5ca4800cbfb8b5b04c8e030d8114a7f8" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75ee5/75ee59c19e916150fa4b1a22505db426a408de13" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-15 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 202k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595g (1.31 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 shots | 390 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-10L | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $429 | $599 |