Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR III
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43


90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX40 HS
- Updated by Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR III

Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Canon SX50 HS versus Ricoh GR III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the SX50 HS (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the SX50 HS (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.

The SX50 HS was manufactured 6 years earlier than the GR III and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SX50 HS scores against the GR III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS & Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX50 HS Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Ricoh GR III
SX50 HS | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Canon SX50 HS
GR III | SX50 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 69 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+576k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Ricoh GR III
SX50 HS | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX50 HS comes with outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") accompanied by a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) while the Ricoh GR III has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX50 HS versus Ricoh GR III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SX50 HS against the GR III.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX50 HS and GR III is 65 and 90 respectively.

Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The visual below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX50 HS and GR III.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SX50 HS due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR III will offer you extra detail due to its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The older SX50 HS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Ricoh GR III |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-15 | 2018-09-25 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 6cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.8" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 202 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595 gr (1.31 pounds) | 257 gr (0.57 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-10L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $429 | $900 |