Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Previous Model is Canon SX40 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Introduced March 2010

Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Canon SX50 HS versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively well matched but the SX50 HS (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizes.

The SX50 HS was unveiled 2 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the SX50 HS grades vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX50 HS Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
SX50 HS | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | March 2010 | Newer by 35 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Canon SX50 HS
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | SX50 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
SX50 HS | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon SX50 HS provides outside measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") accompanied by a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Canon SX50 HS versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the SX50 HS and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX50 HS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 65 and 85 respectively.

Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The picture here might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX50 HS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SX50 HS using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Canon SX50 HS will give you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger SX50 HS provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-01-15 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 5 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 202 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595 grams (1.31 lbs) | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photographs | 410 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-10L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $429 | $349 |