Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST6500
65 Imaging
35 Features
55 Overall
43
99 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX40 HS
- Successor is Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST6500 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Canon SX50 HS and Samsung ST6500, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Canon and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the SX50 HS (12MP) and ST6500 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX50 HS was launched 2 years after the ST6500 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the SX50 HS scores vs the ST6500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST6500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Samsung ST6500. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX50 HS Gallery and Samsung ST6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Samsung ST6500
| SX50 HS | ST6500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | January 2011 | More modern by 25 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Canon SX50 HS
| ST6500 | SX50 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Samsung ST6500
| SX50 HS | ST6500 |
|---|
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX50 HS features outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") along with a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) while the Samsung ST6500 has measurements of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX50 HS and Samsung ST6500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the SX50 HS vs the ST6500.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX50 HS and ST6500 is 65 and 99 respectively.
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The image below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SX50 HS and ST6500.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung ST6500 to show more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent SX50 HS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Samsung ST6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Samsung ST6500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-15 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 202 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 595g (1.31 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 179 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-10L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $429 | - |