Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung WB35F
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX40 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung WB35F Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX50 HS (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX50 HS was introduced 11 months earlier than the WB35F which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SX50 HS grades versus the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX50 HS Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Samsung WB35F
| SX50 HS | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 2.8" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.1") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Canon SX50 HS
| WB35F | SX50 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Samsung WB35F
| SX50 HS | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX50 HS features outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") having a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the SX50 HS and the WB35F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX50 HS and WB35F is 65 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The visual underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX50 HS and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB35F to offer you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older SX50 HS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-15 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 202k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 595 grams (1.31 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-10L | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $429 | $130 |
