Canon SX50 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43


70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Canon SX50 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX40 HS
- Later Model is Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014

Canon SX50 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Canon SX50 HS and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Sigma. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the SX50 HS (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the SX50 HS (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.

The SX50 HS was released 13 months before the DP2 Quattro making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SX50 HS matches up versus the DP2 Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon SX50 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX50 HS Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
SX50 HS | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Canon SX50 HS
DP2 Quattro | SX50 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 13 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Sigma DP2 Quattro
SX50 HS | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Canon SX50 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Canon SX50 HS comes with outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") with a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX50 HS and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the SX50 HS vs the DP2 Quattro.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX50 HS and DP2 Quattro is 65 and 70 respectively.

Canon SX50 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX50 HS and DP2 Quattro.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SX50 HS because of its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged SX50 HS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon SX50 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX50 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Sigma |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-15 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5 | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.8" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 202 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 595 grams (1.31 lb) | 395 grams (0.87 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-10L | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $429 | $931 |