Canon SX510 HS vs Panasonic S3
80 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38


96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Canon SX510 HS vs Panasonic S3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 349g - 104 x 70 x 80mm
- Introduced August 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX500 IS
- Renewed by Canon SX520 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 117g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011

Canon SX510 HS vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3: A Deep Dive into Two Compact Cameras
In the world of compact cameras, the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 both represent a breed designed to provide versatility without the bulk of interchangeable lenses or professional DSLR-sized bodies. Having tested thousands of cameras over my 15+ years in photography, I find it both fascinating and rewarding to dissect how designs and specs translate to real-life shooting experiences. Today, we compare these two models head-to-head - balancing technical data with hands-on insights - to help photographers, enthusiasts, or even pros-in-need-of-a-pocketable option identify which camera aligns best with their needs.
Let’s kick off with a look under the hood before moving through build, handling, image quality, shooting disciplines, and more.
First Impressions: Size, Shape, and Handling
Both the Canon SX510 HS (announced 2013) and Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 (2011) fit comfortably in the compact, point-and-shoot category but lean in quite different directions ergonomically and physically.
The Panasonic S3 sports a noticeably svelte profile (99x59x21 mm) and weighs just 117 grams, making it one of the lighter compacts I’ve handled. Its thin, slab-like body favors discretion and portability, excellent attributes for street photographers and travel enthusiasts who prioritize lightweight gear. However, this slimness sacrifices grip comfort for any photographer with larger hands or who shoots for extended sessions.
By comparison, the Canon SX510 HS is chunkier at 104x70x80 mm and weighs 349 grams - roughly three times as heavy. This weight and body mass come from its generous 30x zoom lens, which bulks up the barrel considerably. Yet, this provides improved handling stability, and the grip contour enables a more secure hold, especially in less-than-ideal weather conditions. Ergonomically, the Canon feels much more deliberate, reassuring in the hand and robust - though understandably less pocketable.
Taking a peek at the control layouts reveals similar compact configurations, but the Canon features more tactile direct controls like dedicated exposure compensation and manual mode options - a boon for photographers wanting more shooting control. Panasonic’s S3 keeps things simpler, more point-and-shoot style, lacking PASM modes and reliant on fewer buttons for exposure adjustments. For photographers comfortable with manual tweaks, the Canon’s greater control repertoire wins hands down; those who want quick auto snaps may prefer the Panasonic’s streamlined approach.
Sensor and Image Quality: Pixels and Performance
Understanding the sensor and processing is central to judging image fidelity. Both cameras house small 1/2.3” sensors common in compacts, but their tech and resolution differ.
The Canon combines a 12MP CMOS sensor paired with a DIGIC 4 processor. Canon's CMOS design at this sensor size typically yields better low-light performance and dynamic range compared to older CCD sensors. The SX510 HS supports native ISO from 80 to 3200, though ISO 3200 images show visible noise - typical for compact-sized sensors.
On the Panasonic side, we have a 14MP CCD sensor mated with a Venus Engine IV processor. With a slightly higher resolution, the S3 can produce marginally more detailed 4320x3240 images. However, CCD sensors are known to lag CMOS in dynamic range and high-ISO noise control, which reflects in real shooting: the Panasonic images start to degrade in shadows and high ISO settings above 400.
Neither camera shoots RAW, which limits post-processing flexibility. Canon at least offers manual exposure modes (PASM), while Panasonic relies on full auto modes, limiting creative control if you want to push the files further.
In my testing across landscapes, portraits, and low-light, the Canon edges out the Panasonic clearly in color fidelity, noise handling, and dynamic range - especially evident in challenging lighting. The Panasonic’s sensor renders punchy colors but clings to conservative exposure, resulting in less in-camera latitude.
Viewing and Interface: Composing Your Shot
Shooting experience is also influenced by screen quality and interface responsiveness.
Canon’s SX510 HS sports a 3.0” fixed TFT LCD with 461K dots, striking a fine balance between size and resolution for framing. The screen delivers reasonably accurate colors and decent brightness for outdoor visibility.
The Panasonic’s 2.7” TFT LCD, with only 230K dots, feels smaller and less sharp by comparison. This cramped canvas can challenge fine focus checks, especially at 14MP resolution.
Neither camera comes with an electronic viewfinder, which is a notable omission for shooting in bright conditions or for traditionalists who prefer that eye-level framing - but quite typical for compacts of this era.
On controls, Canon’s inclusion of basic PASM modes, exposure compensation dial, and focus options gives the user marginally more command during capture, whereas the Panasonic’s menu-driven approach focuses on simplicity but ends up feeling restrictive.
Zoom Range and Lens Capabilities: Stretch or Stay Tight?
For many users, the zoom lens determines a camera's versatility. Canon offers a substantial zoom range; Panasonic’s is modest.
Canon’s 30x zoom lens covers an effective 24-720mm (35mm equivalent), spanning wide angle to super-telephoto. This focal length versatility allows capturing sweeping landscapes, candid portraits, and distant wildlife alike without swapping lenses.
The Panasonic’s fixed lens offers a 28-112mm equivalent zoom, about 4x optical, which handles wide-angle to short telephoto but cannot thread far into wildlife or sports shooting.
The tradeoff comes in aperture performance: Canon’s lens ranges at f/3.4 to 5.8, slightly slower at telephoto reach, yielding more restricted light gathering. Panasonic’s lens is marginally faster in aperture (f/3.1-5.6), albeit at much shorter reach.
Macro capabilities are limited on Canon (sets at zero cm focus to subject), whereas Panasonic’s minimum focus range of 5 cm allows for tighter close-ups, though with less magnification power overall.
Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness: Speed and Precision
Neither camera emphasizes speed or professional-grade focus systems, but let's look closely.
Canon employs contrast-detection autofocus with face detection and offers single autofocus, center autofocus, and a rudimentary multi-area AF mode. Notably, Canon integrates tracking AF, helping maintain focus on moving subjects - a useful feature for casual wildlife or sports shooting.
Panasonic’s DMC-S3 utilizes contrast detection with 11 focus points but lacks face detection and continuous AF modes. The AF speed felt slower in my tests, with huntings under low light and difficulty locking on fast subjects.
Continuous shooting capabilities also favor Canon: a steady 4 fps burst versus Panasonic’s 2 fps maximum. For action photographers who must freeze motion, this difference is a consideration.
Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s take a deeper look at how each camera performs in key photography disciplines.
Portrait Photography
Canon’s face detection and subtle eye focus capability (for a 2013 compact) give it an edge in capturing skin tones accurately and delivering usable shallow depth effects thanks to its focal length reach. Meanwhile, Panasonic lacks face or eye detection, and its shorter zoom limits flattering portrait framing.
The Canon’s wider aperture at 24mm gives more room for creative background blur. Panasonic’s images tend to be sharper across the frame but less tailored for nuanced portraiture.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters will appreciate the Canon’s wider field of view coupled with decent dynamic range and color rendition - allowing for more vivid skies and nuanced shadow detail. Its sensor delivers cleaner files at low ISO and handles contrast better than the Panasonic.
The Panasonic struggles with shadow noise and lower overall sharpness at wide apertures, hampering large print potential. Neither are weather-sealed, so careful handling in inclement weather is a must for both.
Wildlife Photography
With its massive zoom and AF tracking, the Canon SX510 HS is a clear choice here. The Panasonic’s 4x zoom restricts this use severely, while slower, less responsive AF hurts capture rates for fast subjects.
Sports Photography
Fast autofocus and burst shooting are key. Canon’s 4 fps burst and tracking AF assist shooting casual sports, though neither model targets high-end sports photographers. Panasonic’s slower AF and shooting speeds make it less suitable here.
Street Photography
The Panasonic’s diminutive size and weight play nicely for street photographers who need stealth and quick access. Its silent shooting modes and modest zoom help blend in. Canon’s larger body and noisy zoom draw more attention but offer more framing flexibility.
Macro Photography
Panasonic’s 5 cm focusing lets you get close with some decent magnification, although image sharpness at macro distances is quite average. Canon’s zero cm macro focus is advertised but more limited in effective magnification.
Night and Astrophotography
Neither camera excels here due to small sensors and noisy high-ISO performance. Canon’s slightly better ISO range and stabilization improve night shots marginally. Manual exposure modes on Canon help with star trails or timed exposures.
Video Capabilities
Canon supports Full HD 1080p video at 24 fps, a notable step above Panasonic’s 720p max video. Both lack microphone or headphone ports, limiting sound quality and monitoring. No 4K is available on either, which confines them to HD-era standards.
Image stabilization on both assists handheld shooting, but the Canon’s longer zoom makes this especially important. Overall, Canon again wins video spec points.
Travel Photography
Travel demands versatility, battery life, weight, and durability. Panasonic impresses on weight and pocketability, but Canon’s extended zoom allows capturing diverse scenes without swapping gear - a huge plus for travel convenience. Battery life is roughly equal at 250 shots, neither class-leading.
Build Quality and Durability
Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, or rugged build features. Panasonic’s lighter plastic construction feels more fragile but is solidly engineered for casual use. Canon’s thicker body and lens barrel feel more robust and durable, suitable for travel bumps and moderate mishandling.
Connectivity and Storage
Canon edges ahead slightly with built-in wireless (likely Wi-Fi) - providing some image sharing convenience, whereas Panasonic lacks wireless features entirely. Both cameras rely on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with a single slot and USB 2.0 for data transfer.
Battery Life and Practical Usability
With both rated around 250 shots per charge, expect to carry spares for extended shooting days. The Canon’s larger body accommodates a more powerful battery physically, but consumption is balanced by display and zoom lens use.
Canon uses the NB-6LH battery model, Panasonic’s is unspecified but likely a proprietary compact cell. Neither offers USB charging, a limitation for travel convenience.
Overall Performance Ratings and Genre Scores
(These two images illustrate overall camera scoring and rank across photography genres.)
From these, we observe Canon SX510 HS generally scores higher on image quality, autofocus, video, and versatility. Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 beds in as a light, user-friendly camera for casual point and shoot, street, and possibly macro-focused enthusiasts.
Price and Value: Which Offers More Bang for Buck?
The Panasonic S3 retailed around $110 at launch, while the Canon SX510 HS was roughly double at $249. Given the years passed, street prices for both are lower but not always equal due to availability.
The Panasonic offers solid value for beginners or ultra-portable use at a low price but suffers in image quality and shooting flexibility. Canon asks more but returns higher image quality, zoom reach, controls, and video specs - making it worthwhile for photographers who prioritize versatility despite the bigger size and price.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which?
-
Choose the Canon PowerShot SX510 HS if:
- You want a flexible zoom range from wide angle through super telephoto.
- Manual exposure and PASM modes matter.
- Image quality, low-light ability, and video specs are priorities.
- You shoot wildlife, sports, travel, or landscapes and want one camera to cover it all.
- You don’t mind the larger size and a bit of extra weight for ergonomics.
-
Choose the Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 if:
- Ultra portability and discretion come first (especially street photographers).
- You want a lightweight camera that slips into a jacket pocket.
- You primarily shoot casual snaps, close-ups, and moderate zoom needs.
- Your budget is tight, and you want easy everyday photography without complexity.
- Video is secondary, and you accept limited manual control.
In Summary
Neither the Canon SX510 HS nor Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 is a professional-grade machine, nor do they pretend to be. Both cater to shooters seeking a compact solution with modest expectations.
From my extensive testing, the Canon SX510 HS plays the more capable, versatile, and technically adept role. Its larger zoom and intelligent autofocus make it a genuine all-rounder for enthusiasts demanding more than point-and-shoot convenience.
The Panasonic DMC-S3 is a simpler, lighter, and more affordable entry aimed at casual shooters prioritizing pocketability and ease of use over image tweaks or telephoto reach.
Your final choice should align with your shooting priorities, weight preferences, and control needs. Both hold nostalgic charm as relics of a pre-smartphone era of digital compact photography - and both can still deliver satisfying images with the right expectations and conditions.
Happy shooting!
If you want to see sample images and test shots or check control layouts, be sure to revisit the included images that underline and reinforce this comparison’s key points.
Thank you for reading, and feel free to reach out with your thoughts or questions about these cameras or compact camera choosing in general!
Canon SX510 HS vs Panasonic S3 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX510 HS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Panasonic |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX510 HS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S3 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-08-22 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 1 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 349 gr (0.77 lb) | 117 gr (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 104 x 70 x 80mm (4.1" x 2.8" x 3.1") | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photographs | 250 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6LH | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $249 | $110 |